Switch to ADA Accessible Theme
Close Menu
Skip Header/Navigation
Super Lawyers Leandros A. Vrionedes P.C
Your Injury May Entitle You to a Large Monetary Award For a Free Consultation Call Now 1-800-634-8144 or Click Here to Submit Your Case Information
Avvo Clients' Choice
Leandros A. Vrionedes P.C. - Attorneys At Law
Super Lawyers Leandros A. Vrionedes P.C
Lead Counsel LC Rated
National Association of Personal Injury Lawyers
Avvo Reviews Leandros A. Vrionedes
Rated by Super Lawyers Leandros A. Vrionedes

“Quality Service With My Personal Attention”

Bus Accident $5,000,000.00

A 12-year-old student who was traveling by New York City Transit ...

Learn More
Construction Site Accident $2,000,000.00

A laborer who was involved in demolition of a large building ...

Learn More
Elevator Drop $1,400,000.00

Elevator drop accident in a Queens hospital causing neck injury ...

Learn More
School Bus Accident $1,400,000.00

School bus accident in the Bronx as the result of speeding, causing ...

Learn More

Share This Page:

  • Facebook Share
  • Twitter Share
  • LinkedIn Share
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Avvo
  • Yelp
  • Instagram

Like the Floor, Hospital’s Defense of Slip and Fall Claim Was All Wet

This March, the Supreme Court in New York County denied the defendant’s motion for summary judgment to dismiss the case of Koutsos v. New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Campus, an action to recover damages for personal injury caused in a slip and fall accident that occurred during a snowstorm in March of 2007. The plaintiff slipped on the floor of the emergency room, allegedly because the floor was wet and slippery from people tracking in snow and water from outside. The plaintiff sued the hospital for injuries to his wrist sustained in the fall.

In its motion to dismiss the case on summary judgment (where the case is dismissed by the judge before trying the case to a jury), the defendant hospital made several arguments, including the following:

  • It had no obligation to constantly maintain dry floors during inclement weather
  • It did not create the hazardous condition or have actual notice of it
  • It did not have constructive notice of the condition merely from a general awareness that it was snowing outside
  • There was no evidence that the condition existed long enough to be discovered and fixed by the hospital

The court was having none of this. The court admitted that a property owner is not obligated to keeps its floors constantly dry and free from water and snow at all times. However, property owners are required to take reasonable care of their premises, particularly the entrance through which it invites its customers. In this case, it was undisputed that it had been snowing for several hours before the accident happened. According to the hospital’s internal policies and the testimony of its own employee, it is required to layout mats at the first signs of rain or snow and to put out wet floor sings and monitor the entrance. These facts were sufficient to deny the defendant’s motion and allow the case to be tried to a jury.

Property owners will go to great lengths to deny their liability for accidents that occur on their property. It often takes a plaintiff’s lawyer with knowledge of the law and procedure and a good deal of tenacity to make sure the case makes it to a jury where justice can be served. If you have been injured in a New York City slip and fall or other case of premises liability, contact Leandros A. Vrionedes, P.C. for a free consultation.

  • Facebook Share
  • Twitter Share
  • LinkedIn Share
  • RSS