Switch to ADA Accessible Theme
Close Menu
Skip Header/Navigation
Super Lawyers Leandros A. Vrionedes P.C
Your Injury May Entitle You to a Large Monetary Award For a Free Consultation Call Now 1-800-634-8144 or Click Here to Submit Your Case Information
Avvo Clients' Choice
Leandros A. Vrionedes P.C. - Attorneys At Law
Super Lawyers Leandros A. Vrionedes P.C
Lead Counsel LC Rated
National Association of Personal Injury Lawyers
Avvo Reviews Leandros A. Vrionedes
Rated by Super Lawyers Leandros A. Vrionedes

“Quality Service With My Personal Attention”

Bus Accident $5,000,000.00

A 12-year-old student who was traveling by New York City Transit ...

Learn More
Construction Site Accident $2,000,000.00

A laborer who was involved in demolition of a large building ...

Learn More
Elevator Drop $1,400,000.00

Elevator drop accident in a Queens hospital causing neck injury ...

Learn More
School Bus Accident $1,400,000.00

School bus accident in the Bronx as the result of speeding, causing ...

Learn More

Share This Page:

  • Facebook Share
  • Twitter Share
  • LinkedIn Share
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Avvo
  • Yelp
  • Instagram

Injured Student Assumed the Risk of Sports Injury

boy fell on ground while ice skating

The Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court recently affirmed a trial court’s ruling dismissing a personal injury case brought by a student against a teammate, his coach and his high school for an injury he suffered in the locker room after hockey practice. The court’s March 20 ruling in Litz v. Clinton Central School District agreed with the lower court that the plaintiff had “assumed the risk” of being injured by agreeing to participate in the sport and therefore could not hold the school district liable for his injury.

The accident occurred in the locker room after hockey practice at a local municipal athletic and recreational facility. The plaintiff was heading toward the showers barefoot when another teammate, who still had his ice skates on, stepped backwards and stepped on the plaintiff’s bare foot. In granting the defendants’ motions for summary judgment in their favor, the court found that the risk of this injury was a risk associated with the sport of hockey, and the plaintiff had assumed that risk.

The legal doctrine known as Assumption of the Risk applies to sporting or entertainment activities in the following circumstances:

  • The plaintiff is a consenting participant
  • The plaintiff appreciates the nature of the risks
  • The plaintiff voluntarily assumes the risks

Voluntarily participating in a sport implies consent to an injury which is known, apparent or reasonably foreseeable by the plaintiff, based on his or her skill and experience as a player. In this case, the plaintiff had been playing hockey for more than a decade and testified that he knew people wore their skates into the locker room and that he needed to be careful around them.

It was also held by the court that changing out of your uniform after practice still counts as being involved with or participating in sport for the purposes of the assumption of the risk doctrine. Had the plaintiff been less experienced, or had the injury been one which was not reasonably foreseeable, the ruling may have gone differently.


  • Facebook Share
  • Twitter Share
  • LinkedIn Share
  • RSS