Switch to ADA Accessible Theme
Close Menu
Leandros A. Vrionedes, P.C.
"Quality Service With
My Personal Attention"
For a Free Consultation Call Now 212-889-9362
Your Injury May Entitle You to a Large Monetary Award
No Fees Unless We Obtain a Settlement or Verdict on Your Behalf
Call Today to Schedule a Free Confidential Consultation

New York Eliminates the 90/180-Day Serious Injury Category in Car Accident Cases

Gavel on Desk: Symbol of Justice, Law, and Authority

New York has just made one of the most significant changes to its automobile accident laws in decades. As part of the state’s 2026 motor vehicle “tort reform” legislation, lawmakers eliminated the so-called “90/180-day” category from New York’s serious injury threshold statute. For years, the 90/180-day category provided an important pathway for injured accident victims to pursue compensation for pain and suffering after a motor vehicle accident. With its removal, many injured drivers, passengers, pedestrians, and bicyclists may face additional challenges when seeking recovery beyond New York’s no-fault benefits.

For accident victims in Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx, New York City car accident attorney Leandros A. Vrionedes, P.C., can help you understand what has changed and what it means for crash victims in NYC.

What Is the Serious Injury Threshold?

New York is a no-fault insurance state. After most motor vehicle accidents, injured individuals initially turn to their own no-fault insurance benefits for a portion of their medical expenses and lost wages. However, to recover compensation for pain and suffering and other non-economic damages, an injured person generally must prove that they suffered a “serious injury” as defined by Insurance Law § 5102(d). Historically, nine categories existed that could satisfy the serious injury threshold. One of those categories was known as the 90/180-day rule.

What Was the 90/180-Day Category?

The 90/180-day category applied when a person suffered a medically determined injury of a non-permanent nature that prevented them from performing substantially all of the material acts that made up their usual daily activities for at least 90 of the first 180 days following the accident.

In practical terms, this category often applied to people whose injuries significantly disrupted their lives for several months, even if they eventually recovered. For example, a person who could not work, care for family members, exercise, drive, or engage in normal daily activities for three months or more after a crash might have been able to satisfy the serious injury threshold under the 90/180-day category even if the injury was not permanent.

What Changed Under the New Law?

The new legislation completely removed the 90/180-day category from Insurance Law § 5102(d). As a result, plaintiffs can no longer rely on temporarily disabling injuries that satisfy the 90/180 standard to pursue pain and suffering damages in a motor vehicle accident case.

The remaining serious injury categories continue to include:

  • Death
  • Dismemberment
  • Significant disfigurement
  • Fracture
  • Loss of a fetus
  • Permanent loss of use of a body organ, member, function, or system
  • Permanent consequential limitation of use of a body organ or member
  • Significant limitation of the use of a body function or system

Because the 90/180 category has been removed, plaintiffs must now establish one of the remaining statutory categories to recover non-economic damages.

Why Does This Matter?

The elimination of the 90/180 category is likely to have the greatest impact on accident victims whose injuries are serious but ultimately not permanent. Before the change, someone who spent several months unable to work or perform normal daily activities could potentially qualify under the 90/180 category even if they eventually made a substantial recovery. Today, that same person may need to establish a significant limitation or permanent consequence through objective medical evidence. This means that some claims that previously would have met the threshold may now face additional legal hurdles.

What Types of Injuries May Be Most Affected?

The removal of the 90/180 category may have a particularly significant impact on cases involving injuries that are painful and disabling but do not necessarily result in permanent impairment. Examples might include:

  • Soft tissue injuries
  • Herniated disc cases with substantial recovery
  • Post-surgical orthopedic injuries
  • Some traumatic brain injury claims with improving symptoms
  • Significant sprains and strains

Whether a particular injury qualifies under the remaining categories will depend on the medical evidence and the facts of the case.

Medical Documentation Is More Important Than Ever

One practical consequence of the new law is that objective medical evidence will likely play an even larger role in motor vehicle accident litigation. Diagnostic imaging, range-of-motion testing, physician evaluations, and consistent treatment records may become increasingly important when establishing a significant limitation or permanent consequence. Insurance companies are expected to focus heavily on whether a plaintiff can satisfy one of the remaining threshold categories.  As a result, accident victims should seek prompt medical care and follow treatment recommendations to ensure their injuries are thoroughly documented.

The Insurance Company Does Not Have the Final Say

One important point that accident victims should understand is that insurance companies frequently argue that an injury does not satisfy the serious injury threshold. That does not mean the claim automatically fails. Threshold issues are often heavily litigated in New York motor vehicle accident cases. Courts routinely decide disputes regarding whether a plaintiff has presented sufficient medical evidence to proceed. In many cases, these issues are addressed through summary judgment motions before trial. A favorable court ruling on the serious injury threshold can significantly strengthen a plaintiff’s position during settlement negotiations.

What Does This Mean for Future Car Accident Claims?

The full impact of the new legislation will likely take years to develop as courts interpret and apply the amended statute. However, one thing is already clear: the elimination of the 90/180-day category narrows the pathways available to injured accident victims seeking compensation for pain and suffering. As a result, early medical treatment, thorough documentation, and careful legal analysis may become even more important in determining whether a claim can move forward.

Contact Leandros A. Vrionedes, P.C.

New York’s elimination of the 90/180-day serious injury category represents a major change in motor vehicle accident law. While many injured victims will still qualify under the remaining serious injury categories, the path to recovery may now be more challenging in certain cases. Leandros A. Vrionedes, P.C., represents victims of car accidents, truck accidents, pedestrian knockdowns, bicycle accidents, and other motor vehicle collisions throughout New York City, Nassau County, and Westchester County. The firm works closely with medical providers and experts to establish serious injuries and pursue the compensation clients deserve.

If you were injured in a motor vehicle accident in NYC, contact Leandros A. Vrionedes, P.C., today to discuss your rights and how New York’s recent legal changes may affect your claim.

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Designed and Powered by NextClient

© 2023 - 2026 Leandros A. Vrionedes, P.C. All rights reserved.
Custom WebShop™ website design by NextClient.com.