Switch to ADA Accessible Theme
Close Menu
Skip Header/Navigation
Super Lawyers Leandros A. Vrionedes P.C
Your Injury May Entitle You to a Large Monetary Award For a Free Consultation Call Now 1-800-634-8144 or Click Here to Submit Your Case Information
Avvo Clients' Choice
Leandros A. Vrionedes P.C. - Attorneys At Law
Super Lawyers Leandros A. Vrionedes P.C
Lead Counsel LC Rated
National Association of Personal Injury Lawyers
Avvo Reviews Leandros A. Vrionedes
Rated by Super Lawyers Leandros A. Vrionedes

“Quality Service With My Personal Attention”

Bus Accident $5,000,000.00

A 12-year-old student who was traveling by New York City Transit ...

Learn More
Construction Site Accident $2,000,000.00

A laborer who was involved in demolition of a large building ...

Learn More
Elevator Drop $1,400,000.00

Elevator drop accident in a Queens hospital causing neck injury ...

Learn More
School Bus Accident $1,400,000.00

School bus accident in the Bronx as the result of speeding, causing ...

Learn More

Share This Page:

  • Facebook Share
  • Twitter Share
  • LinkedIn Share
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Avvo
  • Yelp
  • Instagram

Evidence Spoiled by Surgery?


In a lengthy opinion that is sure to generate considerable debate and controversy, a judge earlier this week in the Queens County case of Mangione v. Jacobs et al. ruled that a plaintiff who underwent spinal surgery damaged her personal injury case by doing so, holding that the operation “spoiled evidence” of her injury before the defense had a chance to properly examine it.

The plaintiff claimed that she was injured in a 2009 car accident that occurred while she was riding in a taxicab in Queens. In 2010, she filed a lawsuit against the drivers of both vehicles as well as the company which operated the taxi.

Once a lawsuit is filed and before the trial is held, there is a lengthy period called discovery, during which time each party is allowed to “discover” evidence and information from the other side by taking depositions, submitting interrogatories, and using other legal processes. In a personal injury case, it is not uncommon for the defense to ask for an Independent Medical Examination, or IME, of the plaintiff by a different doctor than the plaintiff has been using.

According to the judge’s ruling, the plaintiff in this case had been ordered to undergo an IME at least three times prior to the surgery, but she never complied with the order. Although plaintiff’s lawyers argued that she had already participated in four IMEs, the judge decided they didn’t count because they were done to determine a different legal issue than the defendants wanted with their current request.

It may seem hard to believe that electing to have surgery to treat your personal injury could jeopardize your chances at recovering compensation in a personal injury lawsuit. This ruling shows how important it is to obtain legal representation as soon as possible after an accident from an experienced New York personal injury trial lawyer who can advise you on how to obtain necessary medical care while also succeeding in negotiating a settlement or winning a jury verdict in court that compensates you for your damages. In New York City, contact Leandros A. Vrionedes, P.C. for a free consultation.

  • Facebook Share
  • Twitter Share
  • LinkedIn Share
  • RSS