Skip to main content

Exit WCAG Theme

Switch to Non-ADA Website

Accessibility Options

Select Text Sizes

Select Text Color

Website Accessibility Information Close Options
Close Menu
Leandros A. Vrionedes, P.C. Motto

New York City Personal Injury Lawsuit Dismissed for Late Filing

New York Street

On October 13, 2011, Melissa Guzy was crossing the street in the crosswalk at the intersection of East 23rd Street and Park Avenue South in Manhattan when she was struck and injured by a city bus.

Guzy served notice of her claim to the New York City Transit Authority on November 15. A long period of back-and-forth communication between Guzy’s lawyer and the Transit Authority then ensued, including requests by Guzy for documents from the Transit Authority and requests from the Transit Authority for authorizations to release medical and employment records. Along the way, there were procedures taking place such as a Statutory Hearing and an Independent Medical Examination.

This process dragged on for well over a year and a half before the plaintiff finally filed a lawsuit in the Supreme Court, New York County, on August 15, 2013. Unfortunately, the time limit to file a personal injury lawsuit against the Transit Authority is one year and four months from the date of the accident (see Public Authorities Law, section 1212). The Transit Authority moved to dismiss the claim because it was filed too late. The Supreme Court agreed, and the case of Guzy v. New York City was dismissed.

The plaintiff had opposed the motion for several reasons. The plaintiff argued that the statute of limitations period should be tolled, or extended, during the time the Transit Authority’s investigation was ongoing. After all, if the Transit Authority were to eventually satisfactorily settle the claim, there would be no need to sue. Since the Transit Authority was continually asking the plaintiff for information to process the claim, and the plaintiff held off on suing because it relied on the fact that the investigation was ongoing, the plaintiff argued that the Transit Authority should not be allowed to assert the statute of limitations as a defense.

The court disagreed with the plaintiff, however. According to the court, since the Transit Authority did not intentionally deceive or trick the plaintiff into not filing a lawsuit within the statutory time frame, the defendant could assert the statute of limitations as a valid defense.

It cannot be stressed enough how important it is to pay attention to timelines and deadlines for filing a lawsuit. The rules change depending upon the type of case (personal injury, wrongful death, medical malpractice…) and the type of defendant (private party, City of New York, Transit Authority…), and they are especially tricky when dealing with municipal defendants, where there are notice requirements and dates to meet in addition to the statute of limitations. Make sure you contact an experienced New York City personal injury attorney as soon as possible after the accident to ensure that all important timelines and deadlines are met. It would be a shame to lose your lawsuit on a technicality and not be able to recover compensation to help with your medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other legal damages.

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

In order to help you more quickly, please fill out the form below and click submit.

By submitting this form I acknowledge that form submissions via this website do not create an attorney-client relationship, and any information I send is not protected by attorney-client privilege.

Skip footer and go back to main navigation